The NDIS will transform the way services are provided to people with disabilities, including those related to a mental health condition. cohealth supports the shift to providing consumers with greater choice and control over the support they receive. This submission outlines the cohealth response to this Federal government inquiry, and our serious concerns, that:
– there will be a significant loss of services in Victoria for people who are not eligible for the NDIS
– people who are eligible for the NDIS may not receive the right level of support as the prices set by the NDIS are too low to provide quality support
– the most vulnerable and marginalised consumers will struggle to access the NDIS
We make a number of recommendations that the NDIS, and the funding structure for community mental health services, be adapted to better reflect the particular needs of people with psychosocial disabilities, and to provide more effective services to more people.
Joint Standing Committee on the National Disability Insurance Scheme
PO Box 6100
Canberra ACT 2600
By email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Dear Committee Secretary
cohealth welcomes the opportunity to make the following submission to the Joint Standing Committee on the National Disability Insurance Scheme’s inquiry into the provision of services under the NDIS for people with psychosocial disabilities related to a mental health condition.
In addition, cohealth would welcome the opportunity to provide verbal evidence to the Inquiry, if hearings are held. We anticipate that users of cohealth mental health services will also be willing to provide their insights to the Committee.
Please do not hesitate to contact us should you require further information or assistance in your inquiry
cohealth welcomes the opportunity to provide a submission to the Joint Standing Committee on the National Disability Insurance Scheme inquiry into the provision of services under the NDIS for people with psychosocial disabilities related to a mental health condition. cohealth provides a range of services for people with these conditions, from residential accommodation to community outreach and mentoring to interagency planning coordination. Our work is based on a recovery framework and strength based approach, and as such we welcome the fundamental NDIS philosophy of client choice and control. We also acknowledge the potential opportunities for NDIS participants to identify and structure their supports in the ways that best suit them.
Nonetheless, our depth of experience working with people with mental health issues leads us to have concerns about the ability of the NDIS, as it currently stands, to provide adequate, timely support to consumers with psychosocial disability. We also have serious concerns about the loss of support to those ineligible for, or unable to access, the NDIS. Victoria is unique among the states in having transferred all funding for community mental health services to the NDIS. We therefore have serious concerns that there will be a significant loss in community based services and support for those ineligible for NDIS.
cohealth consumers in the North East Melbourne area are currently transitioning to the NDIS, and our comments in this submission reflect their experiences, along with those of workers and the service system involved.
Our key concerns are summarised here, and elaborated in response to each of the terms of reference, following.
The risks of reduced services to people with mental illness, their families and the community are real and significant. The potential unintended consequences of the change to the overall mental health support system – decline in wellbeing, greater responsibility placed on families and informal supports, and pressure on the acute mental health, health, alcohol and other drugs and justice systems – run counter to the aims of the NDIS.
cohealth recommends that the NDIS, and the funding structure for community mental health services, be adapted in a number of ways to better reflect the particular needs of people with psychosocial disabilities, and provide more effective services to more people:
NDIS eligibility criteria specifically excludes some current consumers of mental health services. Others are alienated from accessing NDIS services by the language and processes involved.
Eligibility criteria related to residence and age will also preclude other consumers of mental health services from accessing NDIS. cohealth is currently able to provide services to refugees and asylum seekers, and people from New Zealand. Once Victorian community mental health funding transfers to the NDIS these people will be unable to access services. Refugees and asylum seekers are a particularly vulnerable and disadvantaged group and reduction of supports could have a significant impact on their wellbeing. While the state Department of Health and Human Services has indicated that these consumers will be able to have ‘continuity of supports’, and some of the support functions may be met with the Information, Linkages and Capacity building framework, questions remain as to the adequacy of these measures. Whether they will receive the same level of support is not clear. The support available for people who develop mental illness in the future, but fall outside NDIS guidelines, is of grave concern.
Finally, the staggered roll out of the NDIS will result in unequal treatment of people of the same age, with the same needs, but who live in different locations. Those who turn 65 prior to the date NDIS is rolled out in their area will not be eligible, even though they would have been eligible had they lived in an area where NDIS was introduced earlier.
1. Revise NDIS terminology to more closely align to the recovery approach. This should be done in close consultation with consumers, carers and existing support services.
2. The Commonwealth and state governments commit sufficient funding to ensure that all people in need of mental health services, regardless of NDIS eligibility (eg refugees, those not meeting the ‘permanent disability’ requirement, people from New Zealand), will continue to be provided with high quality services and supports.
3. Assess age eligibility at the time the NDIS commenced, not when the NDIS rolls out in a particular area.
The transition to the NDIS of Commonwealth and Victorian government short and long term mental health services will result in significant services gaps for people ineligible for the NDIS. For example, cohealth estimates that 40%, of current PHaMS and D2DL (Day to Day Living in the Community) clients will not be eligible for the NDIS. In Victoria, unlike other states, all state funded Mental Health Community Support Services funding will be rolled into the NDIS, along with Commonwealth Government funded services. cohealth holds grave concerns that there will be a significant loss of capacity in the Victorian community mental health sector, and supports, for people ineligible for the NDIS.
In addition, programs that provide ‘lower level’ support, that assist consumers remain healthy and functioning, are expected to no longer be available. Group programs, peer support programs and carer supports – all important contributors to recovery, and valuable to many consumers and their families – may not be financially viable or practical to run under the new funding arrangements.
At the same time, the NDIS pricing structure is likely to drive down the quality of services provided, as providers find that it is not financially viable to provide the specialised psychosocial support needed for people experiencing mental illness (see discussion on pricing structure at ‘i. Any related matter’, below).
Disadvantaged groups such as refugees, CALD communities, people experiencing homelessness, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander groups and those with complex support needs are particularly likely to be vulnerable to reductions in the amount and quality of services, and at serious risk of ‘falling through the cracks’. In addition, some consumers eligible for NDIS, but unwilling or unable to join the scheme will be left without supports.
‘Assertive’ outreach will be required to identify, engage with and support people with complex support needs to transition to NDIS. While LACs are responsible for contacting potential participants they are currently doing this via phone calls. However, due to the nature of some psychosocial disabilities, relying on phone calls can make engagement difficult. cohealth is aware of consumers confused by the reason for these phone contacts, and so ignoring them. Others may not have credit to return calls, or have changed phone numbers. The capacity to undertake assertive outreach is essential to reach and engage with these consumers. cohealth has grave concerns that some of the groups most in need of support will be not be engaged with the NDIS without this capacity.
The National Institute of Labour Studies 2016 Evaluation of the NDIS Intermediate Report confirms these experiences:
“Services considered underfunded were one-to-one community participation, mental health services, group services and services for people with complex needs. Rather than ceasing to provide particular services, providers continued to absorb financial losses but were closely monitoring their financial sustainability. Several providers anticipated their organisation would need to cease particular services when block funding ended. Funding for travel continued to be a concern at wave 2” 
Psychosocial support services are critical in enabling people to access and use other community and government services and supports. For people with mental illness, this can require long term, therapeutic support from a consistent and trusted worker. The loss of this support for those ineligible for NDIS will impact on their ability to access a range of other supports, services and entitlements. Even those people eligible for the NDIS may lose the consistent support from the same worker due to the limitations of the pricing structure (see discussion on pricing structure at ‘i. Any related matter’, below).
The reduction of these services will clearly have an impact on individual consumers, with a real risk of a detrimental impact on their health and wellbeing, and increased pressure on acute services.
4. Federal and state governments commit sufficient funding to ensure specialist community mental health service are maintained outside the NDIS to meet the mental health needs of those ineligible for, or unwilling to join, the NDIS.
5. Increase resourcing to LACs to engage in active outreach to engage harder to reach groups.
cohealth is concerned that insufficient funding has been allocated to the Information, Linkages and Capacity Building (ILC) program to effectively meet the aims of this framework, or to meet the support needs of consumers ineligible for funded packages. Of the $682m allocated annually to ILC (at full roll out), $550m is allocated to Local Area Coordination (LAC), leaving $132m nationally for other ILC work. The first funding round is for $13m, a limited pool for national programs. cohealth understands that the focus will be on providing modest grants to develop small scale, replicable projects to assist consumers to access services, or to build the capacity of mainstream services. While these projects are important, there will be diminished scope for services to provide effective, targeted activities for particular communities or meet the needs of consumers who require ‘lower level’, yet still ongoing, specialized support.
Consumers without personal supports or advocates benefit from having a support work to assist them access services. Individual advocacy (or other activities that replicate LAC work) is, however, out of scope of the ILC framework, leaving some of the most marginalised and vulnerable consumers with reduced access to supports.
6. Broaden ILC grants guidelines to allow for targeted projects aimed at specific communities, particularly those most vulnerable and in need to specialised responses eg CALD, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders communities and people experiencing homelessness.
7. Increase funding to the ILC framework to ensure it is able to effectively meet its functions.
There are two key aspects of planning for people with psychosocial disability: i) the system wide processes used to identify service gaps, respond to developing areas of need and develop innovative programs; and ii) the planning process for individual consumers.
“… qualitative reports indicate that some people with disability were experiencing poorer outcomes under the NDIS and were receiving a lower level of services than previously. These were particularly people with disability who were unable to effectively advocate for services on their own behalf, including some people with psychosocial disability and/or those people who struggled to manage the new and sometimes complex NDIS processes”
We have heard from cohealth consumers of a number of areas where improvements could be made:
8. Provide greater support and advocacy for consumers for pre-planning and at planning meetings. This could be done through expansion of the LAC role, or of ensuring continued block funding to services that currently support the most vulnerable consumers.
9. Require planners to have a sound knowledge of mental illness and associated psychosocial disability and related supports. Alternatively consideration should be given to having specialised planners for people with psychosocial disability.
10. Incorporate flexibility into plans to respond to the episodic nature of mental health conditions; and/or improve the ease of adjusting plans to respond to changes in condition.
12. Extend the care coordination role to extend beyond 12 months, and ideally, not be time limited.
cohealth anticipates that, due to a number of factors, spending will not be sufficient to meet the needs of people with a psychosocial disability.
There is widespread concern that the numbers eligible for NDIS have been underestimated. It is also expected that many people needing psychosocial support will not meet eligibility criteria, and so not receive services. Estimates are that approximately 60,000 people with mental illness will be eligible for the NDIS, but that over 400,000 more would benefit from access to supports. This is of particular concern in Victoria, where all current community mental health funding is being transferred to the NDIS. Community based supports will be severely limited for those not eligible for the NDIS. Finally, the pricing structure is too low to provide the skilled and specialised workforce, which can provide consistent psychosocial recovery support.
We urge that ongoing monitoring of projected and actual numbers occurs, and that funding be made available to meet any shortfall. A particular concern is that funding is expended prior to NDIS being rolled out in all areas, with the risk that consumers in these locations being unable to fully benefit from its introduction.
12. Guarantee that adequate funding is available for all areas, regardless of when NDIS rollout occurs.
13. Review the price structure to ensure that support for people with psychosocial disability is funded at a rate commensurate with the skills, expertise and continuity required for effective support.
14. The Commonwealth and state governments commit sufficient funding to ensure that all people in need of mental health services, regardless of NDIS eligibility, will continue to be provided with high quality services and supports.
cohealth experience has demonstrated the critical role of outreach support services in engaging consumers with the NDIS. Consumers without supports involved have reported being confused and concerned when contacted by the NDIS (at times, to the point of declining involvement). With a framework based on individual choice and control, consumers who don’t have knowledge of the NDIS, the ability to advocate for themselves or connections with support services (eg people who are homeless or socially isolated) may miss out on the benefits of the NDIS. It is critical that existing services and supports continue to be funded to ensure supports are provided to the most vulnerable groups.
However, with funding for mental health outreach services in Victoria being rolled into the NDIS, the ability of services to continue this role is uncertain. It is also anticipated that the capacity for outreach will be significantly diminished due to the NDIS pricing structure. The most marginalised and vulnerable groups (eg homeless, CALD communities, young people, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders), and those who are particularly unwell, often need assertive and active outreach to engage. This may require multiple visits to consumers, two workers for safety, the flexibility to respond to consumers outside planned appointments, and skilled, specialised workers. The additional resources required for this work are not currently available under NDIS, limiting the ability to identify and engage potential NDIS participants. We anticipate the repercussions to include pressure on the acute health and mental health systems, clinical services and the forensic system.
15. Maintain block funding for community mental health services to meet the needs of the most vulnerable consumers.
16. Ensure that funding reflects the particular needs of engaging this group, for example, by allowing payment for multiple visits to a potential NDIS participant to support engagement and effective planning.
17. Extend the scope and resources of LAC to include assertive outreach to facilitate engagement.
The NDIS is currently unable to fund services to continue, or commence, supporting someone during a period of incarceration. cohealth is concerned that this will have an impact on their successful transition back into the community on release, or indeed affect their ability to obtain release. For example, people in Thomas Embling Hospital (TEH) – Victoria’s secure forensic mental health hospital – need to demonstrate their links to community services prior to being eligible for release, and currently receive support from these services for a period prior to their release to enable this. If not eligible for NDIS, people will potentially be unable to demonstrate the required links to community services, nor be able to develop the relationships with community based services so important on release.
Once released, it is important that NDIS plans are able to be adapted quickly if the needs are different to those prior to incarceration. In planning for release, correctional staff may also recommend that follow up visits in the community are undertaken by two workers, for safety reasons. The current pricing structure doesn’t allow for this, and may result in either in risks to worker safety, or of services not accepting these clients.
The risks of reducing the services and supports available to this group of people are significant.
18. Extend entitlement to continuation of support while incarcerated, to ensure that links with support services and the relationship with a worker is maintained.
19. Ensure plans can be revised quickly; or have sufficient flexibility incorporated to respond to changed needs.
20. Recognise the highly specialised nature of this work, and make provision for higher staffing ratio where needed.
i. Pricing structure
The pricing structure for supporting people with psychosocial disability is inadequate to effectively meet their needs, including:
21. Review the pricing structure to ensure it allows sufficient resources to effectively meet the needs of people with psychosocial disability. Specifically, a separate cost line for mental health recovery support services should be included, with a higher hourly rate. Provision for payment for features essential to the work, such as active outreach work, two worker visits, ‘no-shows’ and extended travel provisions should be included.
ii. Consumer involvement
Consumer involvement in all areas of service provision is fundamental in ensuring that services and programs remain responsive and appropriate to the needs of the community. It is unclear how NDIS structures, with the focus on individual service delivery, will enable services to maintain this involvement.
 Mental Health Australia 2016 http://www.vicserv.org.au/images/Joint_letter_regarding_PC_Review_of_the_NDIS_Mental_Health_Australia_and.pdf accessed 16/2/2017
 Mavromaras, K, Moskos, M, Mahuteau, S (2016) Evaluation of the NDIS Intermediate Report, National Institute of Labour Studies, Flinders University p 53
 Ibid pxi
 Williams, P & Smith, G “Can the National Disability Insurance Scheme work for mental health?” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2014, Vol. 48(5) 391–394
 Mental Health Australia 2016 http://www.vicserv.org.au/images/Joint_letter_regarding_PC_Review_of_the_NDIS_Mental_Health_Australia_and.pdf accessed 16/2/2017